Yep, I checked yesterday and posted on Gary Younge’s powerful indictment of US Republican “Frat Boys” and discovered that my ban is at an end and I am now allowed to comment at the Guardian but under (heavy) moderation — so says the vivid red message in the comment window when I posted.
This goes back to last year when I tried to post on the Guardian’s hysterical attack on the Chinese at Copenhagen following the exposé that America and other rich nations were hijacking the climate change summit as revealed in the leaked Danish Text. During this period of obfuscation, diversion and a lot of smoke and mirrors, journos at the Guardian accused CiF posters with Chinese sounding names who attempted to inject a few facts into the debate (such as it was) of being five-yuan a time tarts for the Chinese government. Because it’s well known that we have no integrity or political conviction. And in the Independent, Tony Juniper of Friends Of The Earth felt emboldened enough to call the Chinese “inscrutable”, a hoary colonialist term I’d thought disappeared with the Empire and Sax Rohmer.
How satisfying, then, to see today’s Guardian reporting the Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh’s statement that Copenhagen was destroyed by the Danish draft leak.
Dismissing Britain’s attempt to blame China for the disappointment of Copenhagen, the Indian minister said the outcome was determined by a failed “ambush”, targeted at the leaders of emerging economies, by the host nation Denmark. This attempted to switch a new negotiating text for the existing UN texts.
“The Danish draft was circulated at the beginning of the conference, which got mysteriously leaked to the Guardian. That completely destroyed trust. It was the leak of the Danish draft that destroyed Copenhagen from day one,” said Ramesh, at a sustainable growth forum in Hainan.
This isn’t to say that China is incapable of pulling stunts when it needs to, but that it still has a lot to learn from the British Foreign Office and its friends when it comes to manipulation.
One question remaining to be answered: considering Britain invented low-carbon coal burning technology and we’re signed up to the Kyoto Protocol, why is China able to build 80 percent carbon-capture power stations at the rate of one a month, and we don’t even have a single one? [EDIT: New York Times says current highest efficiency is 44 percent.]
UPDATE 2: Almost a month later (7th May), the Guardian comes up with a carefully constructed rebuttal. Very interesting watching the spinning on this subject.
Guardian admits China’s green plans leave US red-faced.
Anna’s food blog here: